Is AI Generated Art Really Art? A Look at the Debate Surrounding Artificial Intelligence in the Art World
Artificial intelligence (AI) has been making waves in the art world in recent years, with some arguing that AI-generated art should be considered on par with pieces created by humans, while others believe it lacks the essential human element that makes art truly artistic.
One of the main arguments against the validity of AI-generated art is that it lacks the emotional and personal expression that is often seen as crucial to the art-making process. As artist and professor at Carnegie Mellon University, Golan Levin, puts it: “There’s a long tradition of art being about human expression, about the artist’s hand, about the artist’s touch, about the artist’s intention. And so, if you take that away, and you have a machine doing it, it’s hard for people to see it as art.”
However, others argue that the use of AI in the creative process represents a new and exciting development in the art world, and that AI-generated art should be judged by the same criteria as art created by humans. As gallerist and art collector, Timo Saghafi, explains: “I don’t think that the fact that an artist is using a computer to create a work of art disqualifies it from being considered fine art… I think that the emotional content and the intention behind the work is what matters.”
One of the key issues at the heart of the debate over AI-generated art is the question of authorship. Who, exactly, should be credited for the creation of an AI-generated piece? Some argue that the algorithm itself should be seen as the artist, while others believe that the human creators of the algorithm should be given credit. As artist and researcher, Mario Klingemann, points out: “The idea of the solitary genius artist is quite a romanticized one and not really representative of how art has always been made… [AI] is just another tool in the toolbox that you can use to create something.”
Another factor to consider is the role of the human artist in the creation of AI-generated art. In many cases, human artists are using AI as a tool to assist them in their work, rather than simply relying on algorithms to create the art for them. In these cases, the human artist is still playing a significant role in the creative process, even if they are relying on AI to some extent.
Despite the ongoing debate over the validity of AI-generated art, it has already had a significant impact on the art world. AI-generated pieces have been exhibited in galleries and sold for significant sums of money, with the first AI-generated artwork to be sold at auction fetching $432,500 at Christie’s in 2018. In fact, a recent study found that between 2015 and 2018, the percentage of works sold at auction that were created with the assistance of AI increased from 0.1% to 4.5%.
As the use of AI in the art world continues to evolve, it will be interesting to see how the debate over its validity plays out. While it’s clear that AI has the potential to revolutionize the way we create and experience art, it’s also important to consider the ethical implications of its use and to ensure that the human element of art-making is not lost in the process.
Get a powerful form builder, a safe e-signature system, and your own personalized dashboard to store and manage all your contracts. Protect yourself in minutes without pricey entertainment attorneys!